http://www.9ask.cn/blog/user/gjlls/index.html

www.9ask.cn 复制网址 | 加入收藏 | 设为主页
我的公告
最新日志
最新评论
最新留言
友情链接
[原创]通用汽车案(四)法庭辩论最后陈述
  • 我是在原文段落之后直译的,有很多内容如格式、缩语等我不懂,敬请专家教导。
     
     
    2

    https://web2.westlaw.com/result/result.aspx?n=2&scxt=WL&sv=Split&fn=_top&cite=%5b1975%5d+E.C.R.1367+(EU)&vr=2.0&docsample=False&service=Find&rlt=CLID_FQRLT1146244&rp=%2fFind%2fdefault.wl&rs=WLW5.04&mt=WorldJournals&ss=CNT&cnt=DOC

     

    EU: Case 26/75

    Celex No. 675C0026

    European Union Case Law 欧盟案例法

     

    Court of Justice 欧洲法院


    Opinion of Mr Advocate General Mayras delivered on 29 October 1975. General Motors Continental NV v Commission of the European Communities. Case 26-75.
      护法顾问Mayras先生于19751029发布的意见。


    European Court Reports 1975 page 1367
    欧洲法院判例集1975年,第1367

    ? ELLIS Publications.
    ? European Communities.

    Index索引


    Subject主题词
    Competition; Rules applying to undertakings; Dominant position
    竞争;适用于企业的规则;优势地位

    Year (Dates)


    Date of judgment判决日期
    1975/10/29

    Date lodged起诉日期
    1975/03/07

    Date overview
    of document: 29/10/1975
    of application: 07/03/1975

    References


    Celex number
    675C0026

    Case citations援引案例
    EEC Treaty Article 85 [157E085]-P3 p 1385
    EEC Treaty Article 86 [157E086]-L2LA p 1387
    EEC Treaty Article 86 [157E086] p 1384
    EEC Treaty Article 90 [157E090]-P1 p 1385
    Regulation No 17/62 [362R0017]-A15 p 1389
    Case 56/64 [664J0056] p 1386

    Bibliographic Information 著作信息


    Authoring institution创作机构
    Court of Justice欧洲法院

    Basic treaty基本条约
    European Economic Community欧共体条约

    Legal instrument法律文件类型
    Conclusions答辩总结:法庭辩论上的最后陈述的请求或证据
    ECJ 欧洲法院


    Document type 文件类型
    Opinion 意见

    Type of procedure适用程序
    Application for annulment – successful 无效决定请求-成功判决

    Authentic language 官方语言
    French 法语
    General Motors Continental NV v Commission of the European Communities.
    Case 26-75.

    Plaintiff 原告
    General Motors Continental NV

    Defendant 被告
    Commission of the European Communities

    Judge法官
    Pescatore

    Advocate-General护法顾问
    Mayras

    Nationality国籍
    Belgium

    Publication reference 参考出版物
    European Court reports 1975 Page 01367
    Greek special edition 1975 Page 00425
    Portuguese special edition 1975 Page 00467
    END OF DOCUMENT

     

    2[1976] 1 C.M.L.R. 95

    FOR EDUCATIONAL USE ONLY

    (c) Sweet & Maxwell Limited

    General Motors Continental NV v Commission of the European Communities (C26/75)

    (ECJ) European Court of Justice

    13 November 1975


    Where Reported
    Summary
    Legislation Cited
    History of the Case

    Where Reported案例索引

     

    [1976] E.C.R. 1367

    [1975] E.C.R. 1367

    [1976] 1 C.M.L.R. 95

    [1976] F.S.R. 287

     

    Summary 概要

     

    Subject: European Union 

      主体:欧盟

    Keywords: annulment; decisions; Dominant position; European Commission; fines

      关键词:判决无效;决定;优势地位;欧洲委员会;罚款

    Catchphrases: Restrictive trade practices; dominant position; abuse of market

      主题短语:限制性贸易惯例;优势地位;市场滥用

    Abstract: The Court of Justice of the European Union considered an application by General Motors Continental N.V., A, for an annulment of the decision of the Commission to impose a fine of 100,000 units of account for A's infringement of the Treaty of Rome Art. 86.

    提要:根据通用汽车大陆公司(简A)的请求,欧盟法院考虑撤销由委员会作出的给予A因违反罗马条约第86条规定受到的100,000欧洲货币单位的罚款的决定。

     

    Summary: Held, (1) the Court of Justice would annul the decision of the Commission, because in the circumstances there was no abuse of a dominant position within Art. 86; (2) a monopoly granted by a state to a private undertaking, where that undertaking is free to fix its price for performing a particular , amounts to a dominant position within the meaning of Art. 86; (3) an abuse of such position might consist in the imposition of a price for performing that which was excessive in relation to the economic of the service provided; (4) in the circumstances, where an excessive price was charged to deal with the new situation before the firm involved had acquired sufficient experience to determine an appropriate charge, and where the firm soon realised that its price was excessive and remedied the position, repaying the excess, that would not constitute an abuse; (5) A was not granted costs.

     摘要:支持原告的无效判决请求,(1)法院将撤销委员会的决定,因情势表明无第86条规定的滥用优势地位存在;(2)根据国家授予一家私营企业以垄断,如果这家企业在履行其某一特定职能时是自由决定价格的,则构成第86条规定的滥用优势地位;(3)这样一种滥用可以包括其强加的履行职能的价格过多地超出其朝代服务的经济价值;(4)此时,如果一种超高价格在所涉企业获取充分的经验来决定一个合适价格之前就被收取以应付新的形势,而且如果这家企业在意识到其价格超高之后就修正了其偏差并把多收的费用退还了,则不构成滥用;(5A没有被豁免诉讼费用。


    Judge法官: R Lecourt (President首席)

    Legislation Cited 援引的法律


    Treaty of Rome 1957 Art. 86

    History of the Case 本案历史

     

    Direct History 

     

    General Motors Continental NV v Commission of the European Communities (C26/75), [1975] E.C.R. 1367 (AGO)

    -->General Motors Continental NV v Commission of the European Communities (C26/75), [1976] E.C.R. 1367; [1975] E.C.R. 1367; [1976] 1 C.M.L.R. 95; [1976] F.S.R. 287 (ECJ)

    END OF DOCUMENT

     

     

    [1976] 1 C.M.L.R. 95

    https://web2.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?DB=4688&SerialNum=1975026521&FindType=g&AP=&mt=WorldJournals&fn=_top&sv=Split&vr=2.0&rs=WLW5.04

     

    *95 General Motors Continental N.V. v. E.C. Commission

    (Case 26/75)

     

    Before the Court of Justice of the European Communities

     

    ECJ

     

    ( The President, Judge R. Lecourt; Judges A. M. Donner, J. Mertens de

    Wilmars, P. Pescatore, M. Sorensen, Lord Mackenzie Stuart and A. O'Keeffe). M.

    Henri Mayras, Advocate General.

     

    13 November 1975

发表评论:

    大名:
    密码: (游客无须输入密码)
    主页:
    标题:
用户登录
博客搜索
我的相册
时间记忆
加入群组
我的好友
博客信息